The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has received various questions about the value and authority of its notification of October 6, 1995, published in L'Osservatore Romano on Monday/Tuesday, October 23/24, 1995, p. 2 (L'Osservatore Romano English edition, October 25, 1995, p. 12), regarding the writings and messages of Mrs. Vassula Ryden attributed to alleged revelations and disseminated in Catholic circles throughout the world.
1) The notification addressed to the pastors and faithul of the Catholic Church retains all its force. It was approved by the competent authorities and will be published in Acta Apostolicae Sedis, the official organ of the Holy See, with the signatures of the prefect and the secretary of the Congregation.
2) Regarding the reports circulated by some news media concerning a restrictive interpretation of this notification, given by His Eminence the cardinal perfect in a private conversation with a group of people to whom he granted an audience in Guadalajara, Mexico, on May 10, 1996. The same cardinal prefect wishes to state:
a) as he said, the faithful are not to regard the messages of Vassula Ryden as divine revelations, but only as her personal meditations;
b) these meditations, as the notification explained, include, along with positive aspects, elements that are negative in the light of Catholic doctrine;
c) therefore, pastors and the faithful are asked to exercise serious spiritual discernment in this matter and to preserve the purity of the faith, morals and spiritual life, not by relying on alleged revelations but by following the revealed Word of God and the directives of the Church's magisterium.
1) The interpretation given by some individuals to a decision approved by Paul VI on October 14, 1996 and promulgated on November 15 of that year, in virtue of which writings and messages resulting from alleged revelations could be freely circulated in the Church, is absolutely groundless. This decision actually referred to the "Abolition of the Index of Forbidden Books," and determined that - after the relevant censures were lifted - the moral obligation still remained of not circulating or reading those writings which endanger faith and morals.
2) It should be recalled however that with regard to the circulation of texts of alleged private revelations, canon 823, 1 of the current Code remains in force: "the pastors of the Church have the... right to demand that writings to be published by the Christian faithful which touch upon faith or morals be submitted to their judgment."
3) Alleged supernatural revelations and writings concerning them are submitted in first instance to the judgment of the diocesan bishop, and, in particular cases, to the judgment of the episcopal conference and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.
December 4, 1996
Joannes Paulus II